Iranian Americans: Trump or Harris? The Appeal of the Strongman
The 2020 US presidential election was a watershed moment in American politics, and for many Iranian Americans, the choice between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presented a unique dilemma. While the two candidates represented vastly different political ideologies, both figures, in their own way, embodied a certain "strongman" appeal that resonated with a segment of the Iranian American community.
Trump's appeal lay in his perceived strength and decisiveness. He promised to "make America great again" and to "take back control" from the "elites" and the "establishment." For many Iranian Americans, who had faced decades of political turmoil and instability in their home country, Trump's message of strength and decisiveness was alluring. They saw in him a leader who would not be swayed by "political correctness" and who would stand up to America's adversaries, including Iran.
Harris, on the other hand, represented a different kind of strength: the strength of a progressive, feminist leader. As the first woman of color on a major party ticket, she embodied a vision of progress and change that resonated with many Iranian Americans who had experienced firsthand the struggles of women and minorities in both Iran and the United States.
The "Strongman" Appeal:
The attraction to strongman figures is not unique to Iranian Americans. Across the globe, in times of uncertainty and instability, people often turn to leaders who promise decisive action and a return to a more "certain" past. This appeal is particularly strong in communities that have experienced political and economic instability, like the Iranian American community.
However, the appeal of the strongman comes with significant risks. Strongman leaders often operate outside of the rule of law, suppressing dissent and undermining democratic institutions. This can lead to authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses.
A Divided Community:
The 2020 election highlighted the deep divisions within the Iranian American community. Some Iranian Americans saw Trump as a protector of their interests, while others saw him as a threat to their values and freedoms. Similarly, Harris's progressive platform appealed to some while alienating others who felt she was too far removed from their lived experiences.
Moving Forward:
The 2020 election was a reminder of the complex and evolving relationship between Iranian Americans and the United States. As the community continues to grapple with the legacy of the Iranian Revolution and the challenges of living in a new homeland, it is crucial to engage in open and honest dialogue about the future of the Iranian American community and its role in American society.
In Conclusion:
While the 2020 election brought forth a complex dynamic within the Iranian American community, it also revealed a powerful desire for strong leadership and a longing for a more stable and secure future. Understanding this desire and its complexities is essential for forging a more inclusive and equitable future for all Americans, including Iranian Americans.